Skip to content
comparisons4 min read

3Commas vs Bitsgap 2025: Which Bot Platform Should You Use?

I've run both platforms with real money. 3Commas wins on DCA, Bitsgap wins on grid and UI. Here's the full breakdown to help you pick.

Affiliate disclosure: This post may contain affiliate links. If you sign up through a link on this page I may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This does not affect my ratings. Learn more.

Both 3Commas and Bitsgap are legitimate, well-established bot platforms. I've used both with real capital over the past 18 months. The short answer: they're not really competing for the same user.

Here's the detailed breakdown.

Side-by-side comparison

Feature3CommasBitsgap
DCA BotExcellentGood
Grid BotGoodExcellent
UI / UXClutteredClean
Exchange support20+15+
Paper trading
Futures support
Backtesting
Free plan
Cheapest paid plan$29/mo$23/mo
API accessPro ($99)Max ($90)
Mobile app qualityFairGood

DCA bots: 3Commas wins

3Commas has the most sophisticated DCA bot implementation I've tested. The safety order configuration is more granular, the deal management UI is better, and the paper trading simulation is more realistic.

Bitsgap's DCA bot (called "DCA Bot" in their interface, they rebranded from "COMBO") works, but it has fewer configuration options and the deal monitoring is less detailed.

If your primary use case is DCA, 3Commas is the better tool.

Grid bots: Bitsgap wins

Bitsgap's grid bot is one of the best in class. The grid visualiser shows you exactly what the bot will do before you launch it. The backtesting tool lets you run the grid configuration against 6 months of historical data.

3Commas has a grid bot but the configuration is less intuitive and there's no backtester.

UI and usability: Bitsgap wins

Bitsgap is simply a better-designed application. The dashboard is cleaner, navigation makes sense, and the bot creation flow is more guided. I can spin up a Bitsgap grid bot in 3 minutes. 3Commas takes 8-10 minutes to do the same thing.

If you're newer to bot trading, Bitsgap's interface will frustrate you less.

Pricing comparison

Both platforms have restructured pricing recently. Rough comparison at mid-2025:

3Commas:

  • Free: 1 bot, very limited
  • Starter: $29/mo — DCA only, 5 bots
  • Advanced: $59/mo — all bot types, unlimited
  • Pro: $99/mo — adds API, signals

Bitsgap:

  • Basic: $23/mo — limited bots
  • Advanced: $45/mo — more bots, backtesting
  • Pro: $69/mo — unlimited bots
  • Max: $90/mo — API access

Bitsgap is slightly cheaper at equivalent tiers. Neither is cheap.

My recommendation

Choose 3Commas if:

  • DCA bots are your primary strategy
  • You need the best deal management tools
  • You want more exchange options
  • You're comfortable with a complex UI

Choose Bitsgap if:

  • Grid bots are your primary strategy
  • You want a cleaner interface
  • Backtesting matters to you
  • You're newer to bot trading

I personally run 3Commas for DCA on Bybit and keep a Bitsgap subscription for grid bots on OKX. They're complementary, not mutually exclusive — though paying for both is expensive.

Pros

  • 3Commas: Best DCA bot configuration options
  • Bitsgap: Superior grid bot with backtesting
  • Both have paper trading modes
  • Both are reliable and actively maintained

Cons

  • Both are expensive ($45-$99/mo for real use)
  • 3Commas UI is cluttered and slow to navigate
  • Bitsgap lacks granular DCA safety order control
  • Neither is worth it below $3,000 capital
Share:X / TwitterReddit
Hung Phu
Hung Phu
DCA BotsGrid BotsPythonCrypto FuturesBacktesting

Python algo trader since 2019. I build and test trading bots with real capital on Bybit and Binance. AlgoGrade is my lab notebook.

Related posts